GHULAM RASUL versus STATE
Under Section 4394 / Supreme 34, the Supreme Court punishes the evidence, the PPC Special Court for speedy trial, the complainant's testimony, the tracker's evidence, the appellant's indictment by the complainant, and the criminal weapon and The prosecution was challenged by relying on the theft of stolen articles. An analysis of the evidence was found to be unreliable by a Supreme Court indicating a contradiction in the material stated in the evidence of the complainant's identification parade and tracker. There is no independent evidence of recovery that was found to be impossible. That a lot of padding was done in the trial against the accused appellant. The fabricated evidence against the two accused clearing the admission of the Investigating Officer failed to establish their case beyond reasonable doubt; the appellant granted permission to give the accused the benefit of the doubt.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Kabir Wala lawyer