FAUZIA PARVEEN ALIAS FAUZIA TIWANA versus SAHIB KHATOON
A IX, R 13 and O XXXII, R 11 In the previous decree against the minor defendants, the reason for the defendant's default reasoning is that the proper service of summons to minors / women will result in the juvenile court guarding the interests of minors. Proper representation should be ensured. The application for separation of the Declaration Pre-Part Disorder was unsuccessful because some of the defendants were minor and were not prosecuted by a guardian, a permanent decision in the appeal was not rejected by the District Judge. And was told that there was no proper service. Female and minor children were there to be carefully protected by the Court's appeal of the plaintiff, the minor being dismissed in the limitation order was prosecuted by her guardian mother, who presented the petition and the court to the juvenile. Was presented as a guardian of the interests of. Be careful whether either party does not perform its duty or does not agree with the two courts' view that it is in Om
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
