Section 5, Schedule and Section 17 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application for dissolution of marriage, restitution of restitution allowance, articles of dowry and the Dwyer Trial Court rejected the case, which was upheld by the appellate court with some amendments. Not only did her claim regarding dowry articles not only present itself but she also presented her testimony and evidence related to the purchase of such articles, the list of dowry articles was presented under the evidence and it was said that the evidence The plaintiff's wife reiterated her contention during the trial court's court correctly concluded that the wife was entitled to receive Rs. 6 lakh as a price for the articles of dowry and the rest of her claim was rejected. The wife was filing false objections / counter-claims, which were not only entertained, rather than mistakenly appealed. It was accepted by the appellate court but also by the appellate court proceedings. The E-court could not uphold the findings and the conclusions obtained by the court regarding the contentious objection / counterclaim, however the husband. His decision on the appeal was reasonable and as a result of the correct appreciation of the evidence and the material, the appellate court had set aside the application for dismissal of the unknown judgment and decree in respect of the objection / counterclaim and the rest. The results were retained and the trial court's restorative constitutional petition was the same Was dealt with accordingly.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
