SHAMIM AKHTAR versus STANDARD CHARTERED BANK PAKISTAN LIMITED
Acquisition of Sections 10 and 9 eliminated the joint venture's multiple obligations to the lenders, the defendant's determination to apply for leave to defend, and the judgment for the case was pronounced The confession was that he was a co-borrower and had just mortgaged his property. Under the personal guarantee agreement, the obligations of the guarantees were joint and several banking courts, if the finance that was returned to the plaintiff's bank and it was not to benefit from the increased amount recovered from the hold It was believed that other lenders had adjusted the liability and were only responsible for the lesser amount that was paid, then it was obligated to give defendants leave to defend the case because separately. The responsibility can only be ascertained. The recording of evidence relied on a document by the Banking Court which was immovable and showed it to the appellant as the participant borrower only, nor was there any check or statement of statement. No submission was made in the name of the appellant The affected order of the Banking Court was set aside and requests for leave for defense were granted, accordingly.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
