Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB versus MUHAMMAD MAHMOOD, ADVOCATE

Arts 185 (3) and 1991 against the interim order of the High Court were approved by the Punjab Government in the writ petition which stated that the complaint was that the Additional District and Sessions violated the relevant rules of the respondents. Was appointed as Judge. Recommendations made by the High Court in the interim order were directed by the Advocate General to submit a letter of recommendation for follow-up by the court only for the decision of the case, the inter-court orders passed by the Supreme Court. I do not usually interfere, nor do the Chief Justice of the High Court have any hesitation in presenting the said document and after the Government has not asserted any privilege in relation to its production, the High Court may, in fact, be able to ascertain the correct position and dispute. Pass an inappropriate order to eliminate because the preparation of the recommendations more suitable for maintenance. Cometh. Instead of stopping the dignity and dignity of the institution from advocacy, only the general immigration advocate from Sidhnoti lawyer