The non-compliance effect of the section 16 (2) and 21 rent submission order failed due to the resort controller's failure to submit the rent, challenging the plea that the rent arrears against the defendant's husband. In the second case filed by the appellants, the lease controller has specifically directed the appellant tenant to submit the arrears within the stipulated period as well as future rent. Allow the deposit to be withdrawn in the wrong name. The appellant has failed to comply and continues to submit in the wrong name the complete disregard of the order and violation of the order. The part of the appellant that he was excluded from the damaged premises under section 16 (2) of the ordinance view taken by the rent, despite the tenant's failure to comply with the rent controller's special instruction. Fails to submit liability for the rented house. Because the Controller and the High Court were unthinkable, the appeal had no merit and was dismissed with costs.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
