PIRAN DITTA versus QADIR BUX
The assessment of evidence under Article 2302 / Constitution 34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Section 302/34, is based on the testimony of PPC eye witnesses and the recovery of blood-stained weapons. That the High Court was not established. Eyewitnesses from various villages did not report their presence in a satisfactory manner at the relevant time, and on suspicion of the evidence of the recovery and the credibility of the Investigation Officer, the accused dismissed the High Court conviction. Offered reasons for not accepting general evidence and rejecting the recovery. Because of the evidence and the fact that the purpose was not satisfactorily proven, no case of leave approval for appeal was excluded.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Loralai lawyer
