SAID MUHAMMAD versus FALAK SHER
Section 2302 / Constitution 34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Petition against a bad sentence based on a deceased statement made by the investigating officer; The general testimony of two witnesses and the recovery of the weapons of the High Court. Suspected of the truth of the dying declaration, and found conflicting with medical witnesses, the ocular witness was found and the recovery evidence was also rejected and the accused acquitted. The High Court had stated the reasons for doubting the fact of the death declaration, that the deceased had survived the attack for a few days and had no reason to lie within a few hours of the incident. Named the suspect who shot him. The presence of eyewitnesses confirmed the fact that they had taken the victim to the police station, and it is only the fact that the empty guns and guns recovered from the accused were not sent to the laboratory on the same day, causing It was inadequate by itself.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Shankiari lawyer