Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ZAHOOR versus LAL MUHAMMAD

Section 153, O VI, RR l & 17, O VIII, R 5, O XIII, R 6 and O XIV, R 2 Proof of Act (I of 1872), Amendment of Sections 31 and 58, Appellant's Proof of Defendants The defendants, as a preliminary issue, are applying for a trial on the issue of eviction in the mind of the plaintiff. Plaintiffs submit a written response to such request, but later take notice that due to a knowledgeable error, the request for an amendment to that word was inadvertently dismissed. The trial court is concluding that the amendment sought was permissible and the same was allowed by the district judge, however, in requesting a review of the appeals, setting the trial court's order and in isolation / responding. The defendant's request for amendment denied that O VI, R 17, CPC did not apply to such application process because the district judge's CPC in response O VI, R 1 sought to amend the response. Order not requested in scope. Eh ask a advocate free from FR DI Khan lawyer