MUHAMMAD ZUMERRED versus STATE
Section 0000, Exception & Sen & 2 302 // 34 Sentencing The High Court, after examining the evidence, held that there was no prior rivalry between the parties and that the incident occurred due to a sudden outbreak. Arrives that the accused covers the case of the respondents. Such a view was justified, with the exception of 4 of the PPC's 5 and the exclusion of the respondents' conviction and conviction under Section 302 PPC to which each of them was responsible. And, therefore, the unclean decision of the higher court demanded not to interfere
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Swat lawyer
