Find a Lawyer

WALAYAT versus STATE

In Article 185 (3) of the Contempt of Conduct (XLV of 1860), 5 302/34 disputed proof of effect complainant, the FIR, the applicant was charged with the first shot which was aimed directly at the victim's chest. While the two co-accused were later fired. But before the court stated that the three accused had simultaneously fired on the deceased, where after the deceased was dropped, the witness testified before the court that all three accused had fired at the same time while another witness. Has stated that the applicant opened fire on the deceased and that the co-accused opened fire on the beating of the deceased once and after his fall, another co-accused also opened fire. Did not target the applicant's lawyer but claimed that based on the evidence on record, there was room for doubt. Who fired first and who shot. Get up, pick up the need for a vacation to appeal the expected point of view, hold on property advocate from Guddu lawyer