STANDARD PRINTING PRESS versus SIND EMPLOYEES\' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION
Article 25 Question of the jurisdiction of the Social Security Ordinance (X of 1965), sections 1 (3), 57 (f), 59 and 64 of the Social Security Ordinance of the West Pakistan notification under section 1 (3) of the Ordinance of the Provincial Government. Issuance Schedule (x of 1965) Applying certain clauses of the ordinance to a particular establishment, and incorporating such other entities into the location as ultra vires of section 1 (3) of the ordinance. Matlu, N.Y., discrimination and violation of Article 25 of the Constitution government was not implemented as a party in the appeal.The Social Security Court declined to know whether the constitution. Whether the violation of Article 25 was a notification or not, the appeal was dismissed by the High Court stating that Section 57 KCL (F) could not include the fundamental question whether the ordinance itself was legally binding on a particular establishment. And because the Social Security Court was not a tribunal of limited jurisdiction to decide on the wires of A, the notification decision challenged Hale.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Choa Saiden Shah lawyer