MUHAMMAD RAFIQ versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL
Section 13 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 1993 Reconstruction of houses and evacuation based on personal need Applicants' solicitation of applicants (i) that landlords vacated their shops And rented it. They were sent to other tenants at different times until May 1984, therefore, they could not seek the applicant's withdrawal by filing a petition dated 10 12 1984. (ii) Although the two foundations of reconstruction and personal requirements are not mutually destructive, the fact is that when the landlord succeeds on both, the tenant's provision of re-entry to the new terms is unwarranted. had gone. (iii) in spite of the fact that the landlord had the right to develop his property in his preferred way, he could not be allowed to abrogate the tenant's rights, and (iv) it That the landlord owns many of the properties they rented after the reconstruction
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Kamalia Musa lawyer