Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD EHSAN versus ZULFIQAR ALI

Article 2 & 2 and Part 304, Part Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) If the evidence is appreciated, the witness being unable to state his presence satisfactorily on the grounds that the evidence contradicts the medical evidence. Defensive version accepted as. And the order of acquittal of the accused was upheld. The appellant challenged the prosecutor to confirm the evidence of the witnesses' opportunity, and challenged the prosecutor while one accused refused to attend the trial while the other defendant. Testimony of grave and sudden provocations contradicts medical evidence and is coming from witnesses of the occasion. Unable to provide a satisfactory explanation for his presence on the occasion, the High Court dismissed the prosecution's evidence and fully accepted the defendant's defense version, convicted under Section 304, Part I, PPC. The High Court did not reject the ocular testimony which was heard. Accepting any part of it is crooked and there is no reason for D advocates from Kamalia Musa lawyer