Find a Lawyer

SHABAZ KHAN versus MUHAMMAD FAZAL KIANI

Section 17 (4) (a) (i) of the Cantonment Rent Restriction Act 1963 discloses the personal need of the landlord to the tenant, proof that the landlord simply needs to prove it personally There was no need to prove that he needed the premises for his personal occupation, but also that his demand was based on good faith and not through malice. No documentary evidence of the homeowner's malpractice statement was supported that could support his request for hunger. Demanding a steady increase in rents was not a bad suggestion of personal need in such letters. The landlord's behavior goes far beyond his personal need which was not proven even in its literal meaning and its general vocabulary meaning. Just separate from desire or desire immigration advocates email from Vehari lawyer