Article 185 (3) Anonymous Transaction Appellants asserts that the land in the dispute was purchased through their foreclosure as anonymous transaction in their own interest and was not for the benefit of the defendant, indicating that the defendant himself The said income tax is paid for the said land and is in the disputed property record and also shows that the appellant's interest in foreclosure allowed the defendant to continue to occupy the land for a long time with the defendant because the anonymous Not finished. The proponent of interest and evidence instead indicated that his intention was to buy the disputed property for the benefit of the respondents, who was his daughter's son and had no male problem with his own account and he too Was replaced in favor of the respondent as the original buyer. Not Appellant \ 's Interest as a Bellamydar, W-Letter Patent Approved by Court Belle
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
