QAIM DIN versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN
A. XLI, R 27 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Applicants were denied permission to present additional documentary evidence in the Appellate Court of Appeal because it was completely unsuccessful and the second appeal was also dismissed. Under which the first appellate court erred in the law. XML, R-27, does not permit an application under CPC under which the applicant's case was severely affected by the dismissal of his first and second appeals, with the first appellate court rejecting the application. He also gave reasons for rejecting the appeal and refused to appeal the High Court justified in dismissing the second appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Panjan Kisan lawyer