KOHINOOR INDUSTRIES LTD. versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Section Pakistan40 Constitution Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 199 Excise Duty Exemption Duty Claims for Return Time Claim Jurisdiction, claim exercise for return of surplus duty was rejected on the ground that it Not made within the time limit. To return the extra duty, not disputed, the petitioner's request was not examined on the merit due to delay, the writ jurisdiction overturning the High Court writ writ petition was rejected by observing this request expeditiously. Will be dealt with. According to the law, preferably within two months - Plaintiff contended that the High Court had left confused without giving one or the other positive direction, the impeachment observation was unsuccessful, the law requiring a positive authority to act according to law and authority. There was direction. Referral for appropriate hearing and related questions were to be considered but leave to appeal rejected the remarks that would also be applicable Ready to investigate
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Kotli lawyer