ALI IBNE MUHAMMAD versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB, SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION WING
Impact of Section 12 Evacuation Property and Displacement Laws (XIV of 1975) Act, Section 2 Land Settlement Law Withdrawal Rules where the entitlement certificate was not validated in the land claim image 1958 Certificate issue was delayed. Due to an error in the High Court and the appellant, the disclosure rules were subsequently banned and the allotment was banned. The High Court accepted the appellant writ petition and directed the authorities to allocate available land to the appellants in lieu of their certified claim as the Rippling Act provided for self-pending litigation. By canceling the law, the appellant's case for allotment purposes was pending for some reason or that the appellants should not face their inaction by the authorities, a division bench of the High Court on appeal concluded. The pending action in this regard is pending. The issuance of a copyright certificate cannot be equated with the allotment process
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer