Article 21 and 115 of the West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance (III of 1962), Section 24 (2) by a local court employee against a mandatory retirement from a service trial at the headquarters tehsil headquarters instead of the district court's jurisdictional suit. Filing a lawsuit against a wrong court suit. The case against his compulsory retirement from service by a local employee was held at the Tehsil headquarters instead of the district headquarters, and the appeal and decision were upheld, which was reviewed and ordered on the remand of the case. That the trial was held. There was no prejudice in the sub division's headquarters, even if the application of section 24 (2) of the ordinance caused some technical error (I: 1962) to permit an appeal for investigation. The judgment and the decree before the High Court could be kept as a jurisdiction without meeting the requirements of Section 21, CPC.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
