HAKIM KHAN versus ASSISTANT COLLECTOR
Article 19 of the Constitution of Pakistan (197 (35 1973535), Arts ? (ant (writ)) and 199 tenants writ were challenged in the writ filing claim that their claim did not properly decide the compensation for improvement costs. It was, however, canceled with the observation that it was still possible for applicants to determine this through an application under section 46 of the cross-border tenancy act 1950, but to waive their commitment to compensate. Withdrawal cannot be ruled out because of the arguments raised in the constitutional jurisdiction which could not be dealt with by Sikh judges of the High Court. False to appeal the Supreme Court's intervention, he refused to appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer
