ABDUR REHMAN versus HAMID KHAN
Section 12 Arbitration Act (X40 of 1940), Section 32 Interim Courts Ordinance (XLIV of 1961), Section 3 (1) and Schedule B, Part I Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Respondents Award Appellant's plaintiff sued for specific performance. Which was in fact given by a third person / mediator to which both parties agreed, as a Shariah Faisal was given by a trial court suit on a reference which was decided by the trial court but On appeal, the District Judge dismissed it on the basis that it was prohibited under Section 32 of the Arbitration Act and also that the award for immovable property was required to be registered under the provisions of section 17 (2) of the Registration Act, 1908 and The High Court was not registered, however, the defendants rejected the respondents' decision on the basis of which the respondent's specificity was required. Responding to the performance of the case and non-award of respondents, respondents said that the distance was an award and that since the appellant was withdrawing from it, the respondent wants it to be implemented only. Because documents
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Wah Cantt lawyer