Section 15 (b) to dismiss the case on the basis that the plaintiff was the real brother of the seller and that he was a tenant of the disputed land that the plaintiff claimed to be a tenant, the civil court had the matter entertained. There was no jurisdiction to do anything that came exclusively in qualification. Revenue court rejected by the high court did not show any reason to have a different view on the matter. It is convinced that under Muslim law the right of premature possession of a mere relationship with the vendor was inadmissible, and could not be accepted in view of the Supreme Court decision. Application for dismissal of appeal in SCMR 406 dismissed in 1987 [Muhammedan Law]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
