RIAZ MAHMOOD versus BISMILLAH JAN
In the payment of rent for rent of section 14, the eviction proceeding on the basis of default should not be deliberate with the tenant that the tenant was not entitled to set aside a different case from his application on the facts. Rental control is not strictly applicable, therefore, the High Court was not justified in excluding the evidence on the requests not specifically made in the written statement, such argument cannot be accepted. Because both parties were required to present evidence on the issues raised by the rental controller. The tenant's legal obligation was not terminated simply because on one or two occasions the landlord accepted the lease as a grace period for payment, there is no evidence on record to show that Appeal dismissed to indicate that the landlord was in any way pleased to receive the rent at intervals.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Digri lawyer