Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAQ AFGHAN versus CHIEF SECRETARY

An Appellant appointed to a position in the cadre of the Provincial Civil Service (Executive Branch) in the Section 4 Sindh Civil Servant (Appeal) Rules, 1975 Sindh Government Rules of Business, 1973, R17 NPS 17; before the Service Tribunal. The appeal was dismissed on the ground that he had not filed an appeal against the original order before the proper authority, namely that the Martial Law Administrator, who was in charge of the Chief Minister's Office, under the authority of the Martial Law Administrator, was terminated during the operation of Martial Law. And the relevant rules were not modified. At the time that the Appellant represented, authorizing the Chief Minister with the Martial Law Administrator, submitting the representation to the Chief Secretary through the Appellant, which, according to the present directive, was to advance the competent authority, which was held, The tribunal did not face any legal weakness. Because it has not been properly maintained that the case should be referred to a service tribunal for the latest decision by law. criminal advocate from Dijkot lawyer