S 12 (2) and OI, R 3 The defendant's claim of ownership as a defendant in the Joyinder revision phase was dismissed on the ground that such an application for defending the case was rejected on the grounds that the dispute. Due to a dispute between the parties regarding the property, the matter should be decided in separate proceedings. Pila raised the question that Hai had decided to question the suit property. In the review petition, the court left no room for the appellants to succeed in claiming ownership of the property due to the gift given by the respondents in their preferred case and under section 12 (2). Separate case will be withheld, as the CPC appellant interferes with the proceedings of the High Court when it is claimed to have been invited by the invitee No.1 through a gift in his favor. Has been denied and this claim has been rejected by the plaintiff,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
