Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

M.A. RAHMAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN


RR 2 (4) and 3 Government Employees (Practices) Rules, 1964 Customs Act (Fourth of 1969), Sections 193 and 223 Reduction of misconduct Government employees, naturally using the option of being judicial, charge Charged with ineligibility or negligence without notice of disqualification of. Or because of a separate basis for fines under negligence rules, this charge is a violation of the principle of natural justice. The inquiry report clearly indicated that the public servant had a genuine and justifiable impression of his powers that he was not available to show that he had nothing on record. Past records of such public servants have revealed that cases have been proposed to be dealt with inappropriately. The service tribunal did not grant any justification for reaching the charge that said the public servant was ineligible for employment. Permanently maintaining a good record of a public servant does not always justify being inappropriate.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
how to become a advocate from Washuk lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.