Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR AHMAD versus STATE

Sections 2 (s) (a) and 156 (1), CLS (89) and (178) criminal proceedings (v. 1898), a hearing in the High Court to stop the proceedings under Section 561 Special Judge (Customs) The smuggling Mercedes car application (s) has been granted leave to appeal the High Court's leave to examine whether or not it was informed under sub-section (a) of section 2 (s) of the Customs Act, 1969 Is not specified, it can be smuggled at all and allegedly told to the person present. The proceedings under section 156 (1), clauses (77) and (89) read with section 178 of the Customs Act claimed that the notification under sub-clause (a) of section (a) of the Act was not issued. To cover the car with the suspects. , Sub-clause (b) of section 2 (s) cannot be read in isolation or as fully divorced from the preceding sub-clause (a) the sub-clause (s) was not notified or (a) ) Could not be made a subject of smuggling. Clause (b) confession of allegations that resulted in redundancy attributed to clause (b) was not explained or reported in all. law firms from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer