Find a Lawyer

SAEEDULLAH ALIAS BACHA versus THE STATE

Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) Section 340 (2) The defense duty of the provisions of section 340 (2), CRPC, has assumed that if the accused did not confess to the crime, he could be charged or charged on his own. Dealing with the allegations will require evidence on oath. The accused could not be compelled to be a witness against himself when it was alleged that he could not be arrested as a prosecution witness when he was charged or charged. The court only had to ask the accused whether he would enter his defense and then leave it up to him to choose to appear as a witness, and any irregularities by the trial judge Or unlawful action was not committed he could not record his statement on oath if given the opportunity. And he refuses to make an oath and if he refuses to take an oath, no negative indication can be raised against him because he can choose or refuse to choose C. Carefully, it was alleged that he would present evidence to prove the allegations in the prosecution's evidence against him, he was repelled. top civil advocates from Qambar lawyer