EMPLOYEES\' UNION F.F.C. LIMITED FAUJI FERTILIZER, RAHIM YAR KHAN versus WORKERS\' UNION, F.F.C. LIMITED
Section 22 (1), 22 D&22 EE Collective Bargaining Unit of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, appellant's union, filed the first application for approval of the CBA certificate for the entire establishment on the basis that the union was the commission. Was registered as an industry. The War Trade Union dismissed such an appeal by the Single Bench, stating that there is another trade union registered with the Regional Registrar of Trade Unions and, therefore, the Appellant Union has made its application under the Appellant Union under section 22 (1). Did not meet the required capability. His appeal moved another application under section 22 (2), thereby relinquishing his previous position, and then another appeal / petition was transferred after another fact which shows that the appellant. The union, at its own custom, rejected its claim of representing the entire establishment as CBA. The appellant's union was not only prevented from achieving CBA status for the entire establishment by its own conduct, but was also a binding sys- tem after discussing the issue after dismissing their appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Lalamusa lawyer