ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, LABOUR AND INSPECTOR OF FACTORIES HYDERABAD versus ABDUL HAMEED HABIB
The West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 5 7 (2) (5) and 5 0 2 accused the employer against the employer for failing to pass the leave, the employer specifically requested in his evidence that Has approved a holiday. Their workers do not accuse the complainant of making an oath statement in any way, which means that what is stated by the accused can be considered a true complainant, held, not emphasized. The accused may have committed any violation of the ordinance and was responsible for it. The complainant should be punished for failing to convict the offender of the offender's house, the complaint was dismissed and the accused acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer