OASIM BRIG versus DIRECTOR, AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, HYDERABAD
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A&38 (3) Complaint against termination of service due to retraction of employment for retaining junior of the same purpose was already restored under the orders of the Labor Court, which was restored under section 25 Was applied after a complaint under A (8). The working conditions, saying that there was an indication of inconsistency against the worker and the order to abolish the complaint was vague and vengeful, and the appellate tribunal took advantage of the complaint and again the appellate tribunal Instructed them to take action directly against those responsible. Illegal proceedings and illicit proceedings are putting the government at a financial disadvantage that should be recovered from their salaries and funds.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
