ALI BHOY versus MESSRS GOLDEN INDUSTRIES LTD.
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 33 (3) Retirement Response Establishment Retirement of Appellant on the basis that it did not achieve the age of instability in accordance with National Identity Card, Insurance Policy and Appellant's Passport. A case was registered against the appellant for misappropriation of a certain amount and a criminal case was filed in the criminal court but the charges against him were not proved and he was acquitted, but despite being bad, he was still a domestic inquiry against the appellant. Was made and consequently he was appellant. Pre-retirement of the re-appellant stated that the appellant was ordered by the Establishment to retire from the date of instability, and not before, all legal, according to a Labor Court order. He will retire after paying the dues.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Kotri lawyer
