DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UTILITY STORE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN LTD. versus ALI KHAN
Sections 10 and 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act 1923 damaged their legs as a result of an accident during duty which the Commissioner, the Workmen's Compensation Appellant Corp., requested to be absent at the hearing date and to reopen its course. Paid. The dismissal, the rest of the former part and the respondent's entire case, failed to explain to the appellant appellant corporation with valid reasons and authoritative evidence why this was the case and why the request for reopening of the case was reversed. Excluded from? , Had nothing to defend the respondents 'claims and the Commissioner's Workers' Compensation was correct in passing an unclean order, no reason for interfering with the unidentified order was disclosed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Dudial lawyer
