Find a Lawyer

GUL MUHAMMAD versus ASSOCIATED CEMENT ROHRI CEMENT WORKS

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Retirement Appellant Retired from employment at the age of 50 Appellant has not announced his age nor his exact date of birth at his appointment. I have presented some other evidence. Medical age was estimated to be 30 years on 15 195 10 1955 at which the appellant did not object in the National Identity Card which stated that the date of birth of the appellant was 12 3 1934 and his leaving the school. Certificate in which it appears that 2 1933 Respondent Establishment, held, correctly retired the appellant from service and there was no error in the unknown order. solicitors from Hariwala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes