DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, SUKKUR versus BARKATULLAH NASIR
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Removal of employment The unresponsive worker of the domestic inquiry specifically describes his position and procedure, which is found customary in the appellate department, and during the domestic inquiry. In defense, the names of other persons should be examined by him. While admitting that the appellant was not given the opportunity to appear in self-defense during the inquiry, the standing orders were not inquired according to the rules of the ordinance and it was stated that the inquiry report could not be retained. Denied. Under the court, the appellate department was directed to reinstate the worker with fifty percent back benefits.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Sahiwal lawyer