HABIB BANK LTD. versus RAZA MUHAMMAD
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Complaint Request Domestic Inquiry Proof Evidence Oral evidence, where documented evidence was available, cannot be accepted where bank employee was accused of wrongful employment. And he was dismissed from the job saying that the electricity charges were mentioned in the book. Complainant was not examined against the actual amount received, who requested that he had not made any complaint against the accused and that the earlier complaint was not due to misunderstanding by his servant nor electricity. There was no evidence that the bill was presented nor the scroll was presented in evidence. The inquiry report received was based on only an oral statement from the Labor Court Manager's Order. The unwanted dismissal persists in the appeal of a re-order without any benefit of the order.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Morgah lawyer