GULISTAN TEXTILE MILLS LTD. versus GHULAM HAIDER
Section 25A & 38 (3) Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Sections 14 and 29 were not submitted by the employee which was objected to by the defendant on the ground that the petitioner was unlawfully retained. Was presented correctly and subsequently withdrew from the refresh permission. There is no point in pleading after the Petition of Labor Court that no question of any restriction filed before the withdrawal of the previous petition with the permission of the court cannot be raised, nor withheld, the petition cannot be retained. Would never have existed and even if the question of limitation had been raised, it would not have been fatal as the time spent in such cases and proceedings could not have been authorized in court. Can be done
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Lala rukh lawyer
