KHALID PERVEZ versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Sections OS 1 and 15 (4), Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXII of 1969), 25 A & 38 (3) The replacement worker is present in service to the person who is not In the presence of such a replacement alternate railway employee (replacement) has been alleged to have been absent for long service and was suspended under the termination order of this account, his holding was not sustainable, the allegations were denied. Presence was malicious, and showcase notices and the opportunity to justify absence were necessary.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Khushab lawyer
