Find a Lawyer

S. AKBAR ALI ZAIDI versus GENERAL MANAGER LAHORE TELECOMMUNICATION REGION, LAHORE

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (viii) (d), 25A & 38 (3) Complaint Request Due to the job and nature of the applicant, there were two different things, including Section 2 (viii) of Action XXIII (d). ) Was designated as an employer. In 1969, the applicant, outraged by the transfer, challenged on the basis of bead misconduct due to alleged misconduct for trade union activities. The Labor Court observed that the applicant had been appointed as his employer. There was no Labor Court order against him, which has been resigned on appeal by the appellate tribunal. And the parties to the case have been called for a re-decision after the occasion of the evidence as it relates to the nature of the applicant's duties, whether he belongs to the category of supervisory, secretary, directional or agency staff and may be found to be an employee. online advocate from Bahawalpur lawyer