Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Complaint Request Compensation Wapda Employee Involved in Corruption Case Suspected pending suspension and extension of suspension period until dismissal denied that breach was not honorable and No inquiry has been made. Nor was any order filed by a competent authority, alleging that he was acquitted of the department and acquitted on account of being deposed and not employed, deserving of no compensation. The suspension period was also increased as there was no rule in WAPDA (Performance and Discipline) Rules that the employee was not entitled to wages for the suspended period unless the bad punishment is respected.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
