MUHAMMAD MALIK versus GHULAM RASOOL
In sections 10 and 13 of 1960, before the West Pakistan was established, the applicant held the land around the village; the applicant was resident on both sides of the stream, where in turn he had no one before the consolidation works. There was no land, while the defendant withheld the matter. Notable land near the Nala respondents was given six acres of land near the village because of the unfair distribution of the six canals against the privileges there, due to the unfair distribution of the sides, the collector snatched the land from the defendants. Applicant's complaint was properly dealt with before. Prior to the appeal of the respondents, the Additional Commissioner was faulty, ie, two appeals were filed against two separate orders under which they had to collect the order of the collector as justified in the presence of this defect. Against the improper order was also justified. Permission was granted and the collector's order was restored
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Moro lawyer