Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus INAYATULLAH


Civil Procedure Code Order XLIII of the CCC Appeals relating to the orders, R3 Notice before the Appeal Presentation, the Appellant against the Appeal of Remand on the Appellant, did not work on the Respondent's notice as under On the objection raised by the defendants in this regard before the required appeal XLIII, R 3, CPC, the appellant contended that such notice was not legally required to be sent to the respondents. The appeal was not born out of a pending case and that the respondents' appeal as a lawyer appeared for the purpose of hearing the rule. Was filed, debated, there was a dispute, as the case was adjourned as Appeal 7 was issued when the appeal was filed when it was related to the pending case and O XLIII , This was a legal requirement under R 3. The CPC, which should have sent the notice to the respondents or its lawyer before filing the appeal, did not comply with the required provisions of the law, was not enforceable in the appellant barriers.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Lodhran lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.