Find a Lawyer

NADIR ALI versus BOARD OF REVENUE

Government Land (Punjab) Colonization Act 1912 Section 10 (4) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 After the expulsion of Mangla Dam applicants received compensation amount in respect of allotment of land, which is Wapda. Had received But for the resettlement of the applicant, on the basis of the allotment sheet issued by WAPDA, the collector in the other district applicant allotted the agricultural land to the applicant, depositing the entire value of such allotted land in the treasury. And was in the control of the Board of Revenue at the stage of the certification board. However, it has also been observed that since Althi has received cash compensation for his acquired land from Wapda, he cannot be allowed property rights in respect of the land allotted to him and the collector will pay the Mangla Dam. The victims have called for a resumption of reintegration proceedings. The allotment of land for the purpose of settlement under the Mangla Dam scheme was properly allotted and the HE was entitled to confirm the ownership rights after payment of the full price through the applicant from Wapda. In respect of the acquired property, it was inconsistent with the allotment given for resettlement inspections and the Board of Revenue's directive on allotment restitution was set aside. No legal consequence of the High Court in exercising legal jurisdiction and constitutional jurisdiction patent advocate from Mir Ali lawyer