Find a Lawyer

REHMATI versus EID MUHAMMAD

The first order approving the change in favor of the respondent was changed by the Tehsildar in the Land Disposal (Land Settlement) Act, 1958, 10/11. It was later found that the applicant was alive and The defendant has mistakenly transferred his land. It has, under the misinterpretation of the facts, said that the applicant has died and the defendant's heir appeal and the defendant's review have been excluded, but the Member (s) Board of Revenue has granted his second appeal. Who accepted the respondent's request and set the lower forum's decree. Since the evacuation land dispute, neither the Settlement and Rehabilitation Authorities nor the Revenue Authorities can decide on the matter, which moved the land after a lengthy litigation to the Assistant Rehab Commissioner Petitioner, who passed the first order of mutation Was made and when it was discovered, a decision may be made to the Tehsildar in this matter after investigation. The claimant was the applicant who was alive and if his land had been wrongly obtained by the defendant, the applicant could not be denied the right through the hypertechnical sophistry, the Member (Review), of the Board of Revenue. The order, therefore, was declared with no legal authority and no legal effect Pakistan, top advocate family court from Dadu lawyer