SIRAJ DIN versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB
Homeless persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958 Section 10 and Schedule Part 3, Para, 13 Memo No. 2240 P One Rd 60, Dated 3 2 1960, Para 5 and 6 Defendants requested to apply for shoplifting dead defendant. Prior to the application rehabilitation and resettlement authorities pray that the shop be transferred to him but never file any application for transfer of shop on fixed form = settlement commissioner pay the shop cost within one month to the late respondent Orders the applicant to transfer the shop within the meaning of the applicable applicant's law as per the prescribed time. PRO is, it had no right to a hearing in proceedings relating to estimated value of the disputed shop and she was not angry or be hearing the victim. Under no provision of law or principles of natural justice, the matter was not subject to any legal weakness and was not bad provided the deceased applicant had no opportunity of hearing.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Thatta lawyer