Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL RAZZAK versus IKRAM ULLAH KHAN


Civil Procedure Code XLI, XML, R 27 and Section 115 of the CPC Code of Appeals from the original rules, the applicant alleges that the appellate court in dealing with the applicants' request for additional evidence filed by them. Has failed, in which the trial court has specifically presented it for consideration. Prior to the decision that no other matter was emphasized before, and the failure to file an affidavit lawyer on which the appeal was requested, along with the request for review, would show that the appellate court While the alleged question was not pressed by the applicant, such question cannot be pressed during the appeal debate. There was no case of interference with the jurisdiction amending the request for review

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from Mari Indus lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.