Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RAZZAK versus IKRAM ULLAH KHAN

Civil Procedure Code XLI, XML, R 27 and Section 115 of the CPC Code of Appeals from the original rules, the applicant alleges that the appellate court in dealing with the applicants' request for additional evidence filed by them. Has failed, in which the trial court has specifically presented it for consideration. Prior to the decision that no other matter was emphasized before, and the failure to file an affidavit lawyer on which the appeal was requested, along with the request for review, would show that the appellate court While the alleged question was not pressed by the applicant, such question cannot be pressed during the appeal debate. There was no case of interference with the jurisdiction amending the request for review tax advocates from Mithi lawyer