Find a Lawyer

KALA KHAN versus QADIR BAKHSH

Civil Procedure Code Orders VIII and O. VIII of the CPC Written Statements, RR 1, 2 and 3 before the Punjab Pre-Impression Act (I of 1913), Section 20 and 21 Prior to the pre-trial waiver petitioners / vendors in their written statement Special request. That the respondent / pre-emptor was present in the sale transaction and he was fully aware of the transaction and the court also settled the matter in that the respondent / pre-emptor stated that in the written statement the applicants / vendor proceedings. There is no request to resign. Or waiver as he should have specifically stated in a written statement that he was reluctant to file a lawsuit because of his presence and participation in the bargaining of the sale, and that he requested the bail to file a written statement. Was clearly objected to in the written statement. Arguments and waivers and he said that the petition was considered not only by both parties, but also by the trial court, which resulted in the parties' case in this case and the parties presenting their offer in this issue. However, the respondents had no power to argue, prevent, and it is wrong to say that no application for estoppel or waiver was raised by the applicants. famous supreme court advocate from Allahabad lawyer