KHALID PERVAIZ versus GRINDLAYS BANK LIMITED, LAHORE
The CPC Rule Order appeals to the KLC's original decree. Additional evidence suit for recovery of money on the basis of plaintiff of ALLI, RR 25, 27, 28, 29 and Section 96 equivalent mortgage, the day before the judgment was declared, the court made the application before the trial He is said to have filed a motion in his interest, which allegedly mortgaged the plaintiff's behalf in 1971, actually died in 1969 and not in the trial court in 1973, however, in the final judgment or on a separate application. While no order was issued in this regard, the foregoing interest agrees with the advice of both parties that the trial court be instructed that it be Record and search for the evidence of the parties at the said point and the appeal may be pending in the meantime, as such, it is not only necessary but also a fair and lawful course application. Additional evidence was accepted, the trial court said. Ordered that the parties record the evidence of both parties, both documentary and oral, on the point only. o When the predecessor died in the interest of the defendant and send his findings about it to the High Court scope and the evidence was directed to remain confined to that point only, and neither party could properly examine any witness. However, exit will not be allowed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Deh Pathaan lawyer
