Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus MEMBER (REVENUE), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 17 and 18 West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act (XI of 1957), Section 8 Punjab Land Rules. 1983, R12 Compensation for Acquired Land The value of the trees acquired in 1983, which has no prejudicial effect, could not be applied to the acquisition made in 1981, but the provincial government did not receive the land. Acts in and under the Act. The government's 1970 guidelines were necessary for more than five lakh compensation cases; more than 5 lakhs in the Department of Revenue as the Secretary of the Board of Revenue, Government of Punjab, were approved by the Agriculture Department to examine the value of trees. In order to obtain the Department's request that allows the Expert Committee to reconstruct the value of trees that have been rejected on two previous occasions, the Board of Revenue later issued its first orders (approval of compensation). Could not review) even if it was the administrative role, to their detriment Working, passed without allegation The hearing / showcase exhibit was not legally valid for the landlords of the applicants and was not without legal authority and without legal influence, if the trees If there is a problem with the compensation assessment in the series, then one can protest before that. The Collector is based on his award on the inquiry conducted by the Collector and the Department of Agriculture at the time of his inquiry, the same acquisition may be challenged in court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. when you need a advocate from Chowk Azam lawyer